Traditional approaches to complex, multi-faceted problems often fail because competing interests focus on their own visions of successful
outcomes, even when mutually beneficial strategies offer greater chances of success.
In business marketplaces, competition among
vendors with similar offerings has been seen as the force that drives quality and service up while driving prices for consumers down.
However, as demand and supply situations grow in size, complexity, subtlety, and importance — for example, in healthcare — players
other than vendors become invested in different outcomes in that supply chain ... and tend to pull proposed solutions in multiple
directions. An already difficult competitive environment becomes a battlefield of warring interests, stalling growth, competitiveness,
and progress.
In such situations, it is increasingly difficult to achieve sustainable success without understanding how competing interests
influence progress and growth and how those interests can be engaged to achieve mutual advantages.
Dog-eat-dog competitiveness isn't
the path to success, and smart business leaders have always understood this. Most businesses in the same region and market space have
drawn from a shared pool of expertise and financing, often cooperating informally — and sometimes unwittingly — while acting as competitors
in the Sunday business sections. In the Boston area, technicians and supporting personnel who cut their teeth at Digital Equipment
Corporation and Wang seeded the rapid growth of many software and hardware startups in New England in the 1990s.
But large-scale, sustainable
success cannot wait on accidents. Competing and complementary interests must come together and act to ensure success. Beyond vendors
themselves, those interests often include: